CASE STUDY

Case Study: Coordinated Cross-Border Support for a Multijurisdictional Matter 

Home » Case Study: Coordinated Cross-Border Support for a Multijurisdictional Matter 

An Am Law firm engaged Sandline to support a complex, multijurisdictional matter involving data collection, hosting, and review across both the United Kingdom and the United States. The engagement required precise coordination, strict compliance with regional data-handling requirements, and seamless alignment between teams operating in different jurisdictions. 

Challenge

  • Data needed to be collected and hosted in the UK to comply with regional requirements. 
  • Additional data had to be collected, processed, and hosted in the United States. 
  • Before any cross-border consolidation, counsel was required to complete a GDPR review to determine what could lawfully be transferred. 
  • The matter involved tight deadlines, evolving priorities, and significant data volumes. 

Sandline’s Approach 

Sandline coordinated closely with UK and US counsel to: 

  • Perform defensible collections in both the UK and the US. 
  • Maintain separate UK and US hosting environments to uphold privacy and jurisdictional requirements. 
  • Support counsel’s GDPR review before combining approved UK data with the US dataset. 
  • Execute additional review in the combined environment using advanced analytics, threading, near-duplicates, and targeted search workflows. 
  • Implement a streamlined review workflow aligned with counsel’s strategy and deadlines. 

Outcome

  • All collections were completed defensibly and in compliance with regional data handling obligations. 
  • GDPR review was completed efficiently, allowing approved UK data to be combined with US datasets without delay. 
  • Sandline’s use of analytics accelerated issue identification and reduced review time. 
  • The team met all production deadlines, providing consistent, reliable support throughout a dynamic, cross-border matter. 

Sandline delivered the coordination, precision, and consistency of this multijurisdictional matter required—across borders, platforms, and deadlines.